Tag-Archive for » CMU «

Writing Thoughts

My 8-year-old son handed me a large stack of papers today. They were his graded assignments from school, which the teacher sends home every few weeks or so. As I went through the stack, he commented on different things. Most were perfect with stars and smiley face marks from the teacher because (as Justin will tell you without hesitation) he is the smartest kid in Collins Elementary School.).

So the paper with all of the marks stood out. (“All of the marks,” by the way, is a relative term.) Above three of Justin’s poorly-written a’s, the teacher had modeled the correct a, and at the end of one sentence, she wrote, “This does not make sense.”

I read the sentence aloud to Justin.

“This new year was very easy to dry the spilled pop.”

Justin looked puzzled for a minute, shrugged his shoulders and said this priceless bit of wisdom, “It made sense when I wrote it.”

And all of that was just a true (and long) introduction to my REAL topic of this blog — writing and (don’t groan) my upcoming thesis defense (because, in case you didn’t know, I am very (very) close to finishing grad school).

Yesterday I attended the defense of one of my good friends, Bud. It went well. His chairman is also my chairman. And I arrived early (Yes, Steve, you read that right — early. I told you I had changed my ways.) and Giggy (another one of my good friends from grad school) and I were talking with my chair, and he was letting me know he would send me his first question to me in advance so I could think about it.

He thinks the question is going to be something to do with how I have changed as a writer during my time in grad school. He noted that he has seen the change (which is unusual in a college atmosphere), and he was thrilled by my growth. I had this particular professor every semester except one, and he is also the one who read and approved my writing application to enter grad school, so he really is very familiar with how I have changed as a writer.

So, I am going to practice my answer here in my blog. Although, knowing this particular professor, he’ll actually end up asking me a totally different question. ;-) And I can’t help but realize his question is very similar to one Shelley asked me when I first started this whole grad school process. Shelley wanted to know why I would want to go to grad school — what would I get out of it?

I think before grad school, I was a good writer, but it was more natural ability than skill. This fit in very well with my journalism training. I would compose an article in my head as I drove from whatever venue to the newsroom. Then, when I sat down to write at the newsroom, the article flowed out almost as if I dictated it. As soon as I finished typing it, the file was sent to the editor and placed on the page. It would be proofed, but the only changes made to my articles tended to be surface-level changes. I never had to do major revisions of content, style, tone, etc. I never had to craft my articles. For the newspaper, my initial crafting was sufficient because of my natural ability.

After my articles were published, I rarely read the printed version. I didn’t read it because as soon as I did, I found something I wanted to change, edit, revise, and it was frustrating because by then it was too late.

But even with my natural ability, when you write and don’t focus on craft, you get lazy. You would not believe how many horrible habits crept into my writing. I was frustrated because I recognized my writing had become stagnant, which is one of many reasons why I wanted to go back to grad school.

I used to say I couldn’t recite the rules of writing, but I used the rules. This is why I say I had natural skill. But now I know more about the craft side of writing, and THIS is why my writing has improved.

I used to be a person who could pound out a pretty decent article or text in the first sitting because I did a lot of work composing in my head before hand. I intuitively understood how to do the initial crafting, but I never went further than that. It was good enough and off it went. Now, I am really enjoying the work that takes place after that initial dump onto the page. I like the real crafting, refining of words. The work after the writing. Because without it, I look at what I wrote, shrug my shoulders and say, “It made sense when I wrote it.”

Thanks for playing.

Category: GradLife  Tags: , ,  Comments off

And so it begins

I have just sent out the official “defense draft” of my thesis to my committee members. This is the final version of my thesis, which will be discussed at my defense Friday. Any changes after this point should be minor in nature.

Now I just want to go through the manuscript and make sure that it matches the requirements of the grad school. The requirement are like 32 pages in length. Here’s a tiny bit so you get the idea:

  • 8.5 x 11 inches in size
  • 20 pound white paper with at least a 25 percent cotton-fiber content
  • Acceptable fonts: Arial, Courier, Times New Roman
  • Font size: minimum 10 and maximum 12
  • Margins for preliminary pages: left margin 1.5, top margin 2.0, bottom and right margin 1.0 inch
  • Margins for text and supplementary pages: left margin 1.5, top, bottom and right margin 1.0 inch
  • Etc.

:-)

Category: GradLife  Tags: ,  Comments off

Defend against who?

I have one week and two days until my defense. I am in a strange place. I have edited my thesis and sent it off to my chair for comments. I am waiting for comments from one of my committee members (Mom and I are going to get those today.). That leaves me with nothing to do except (well, laundry of course, but I mean thesis-wise) wonder what exactly is going to happen May 25 at 1 p.m. in Anspach 110 (if Anspach 110 actually exists*).

What exactly am I supposed to do at this defense? Do I have to prepare a statement? What questions will I be asked? How long will it take? And the big question… What do I wear?

I have no idea and that is a wee bit unnerving. Just a teeny tiny bit. I best be off to Mt. Pleasant. The sooner I get those comments the sooner I have something to do besides obsess.

Kim Hoelzli, YOU have a master degree, so spill. What happens at a defense?

*Last Friday, May 11, I had to turn in a form to the grad school to schedule my oral defense. The form required listing a time and place, and I had no idea what place to list. And so I called my committee chair. He was so reassuring. He asked me where, and I was clueless. And then he said something like, well, write down Anspach 110, I think it exists. I know there are a bunch of committee rooms there somewhere. And so I did, but I can’t help but wonder is there an Anspach 110, and if there isn’t will my defense really exist? One. Two. Three. The world may never know.

Thanks for playing.

Category: GradLife  Tags: ,  Comments off

Revising and editing

I am going through my thesis and trying to eliminate approximately 10 percent of the words. I wonder as I do this, who has been messing with my manuscript? I find myself guilty of EXACTLY the same things I mark in my students’ papers, and I wonder how I didn’t catch it?

I don’t have the word “that” very much, and the adverbs are also few and far between. I do, however, start a lot of sentences with but and and. I also use the word “down” quite a bit, as in I sat down instead of I sat. Another word I was shocked to find over and over is Just. It seems impossible to get rid of all my “was” constructions.

The first three chapters are now down to 11,600 and some words, approximately 10 percent less.

I was going to write more about this editing, but my husband came home from the girls softball practice, and we now have to go to Autumn’s first game of the season.

Category: GradLife  Tags: ,  Comments off

The End

Bring on the revisions.

I have finished writing my thesis! That deserves an exclamation point. I am done. done. done. That is, I am done with the composing from scratch.

I now have to revise, but I have been revising all along, so this should not be so bad. So where am I exactly?

I have finished writing all of the chapters that will be appearing in my thesis. They are all there, structured in the way I want them structured and some of them are very very polished. The others, are very polished, but still need some work to reach the very, very polished status.

I should be able to defend my thesis the week of May 21.

At the moment, I have sent out the first three chapters to my two additional committee members. I received comments back from one of those two.

The remaining chapters have all been edited by my committee chair. I need to revise those, and send those out to my other two committee members. When I get comments back from them, I will revise my thesis to create a “defense version,” which is what I will defend later this month. Then after the defense, everyone signs off and I pay to have it bound, and it sits on the shelves of the Park Library forever and ever as a nicely bound red BOOK.

What have I learned?

1. I learned how to mine for good stuff from the bits and pieces of writing prompts I have written in the past.

2. I have learned that my rough draft material tends to have major issues with conflicting verb tenses.

3. I have learned that I really truly can write something longer than a newspaper article. (When I first signed up for grad school, they wanted a copy of something I had written that was longer than 8 pages in lenght, and I did not have one single solitary thing. Now I have lots of somethings over 8 pages in length. Hoozah!)

4. I learned that while I was swamped with work, my children grew several inches, and when I finally look up from my laptop I noticed that their clothing had all shrunk, especially the boy child who is not yet concerned that he looks like an orphan covered with dirt wearing clothes two sizes too small. Since I have noticed, my most frequent comment to him (besides I love you) is “Are you wearing clean underwear?”

5. I learned that when I compose from a writing prompt I am more likely to be guilty of info dump. Info dump is not good.

6. I learned I was most guilty of writing info dump when I was trying to explain my complicated family structure — that I’m 11 years younger than the second youngest, while the other four are stairsteps, etc.
But finally I figured it out and eliminated the info dump.

7. I learned I was not very nice to my mother when I was a teenager, and she loved me anyway.

8. I learned I can WRITE.

9. I learned that I learned things about me by the very act of writing.

10. I learned how nice it is to finally be able to see THE END. And that feeling lasts for about 5 seconds before you realize now that the degree is within your grasp that now the hard work really begins — getting a job.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...
Category: GradLife  Tags: , ,  Comments off